Search for: "PLAZA v. PLAZA" Results 261 - 280 of 1,257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2010, 11:57 am by Sheppard Mullin
May's topic is:  Beware The New Patent Trolls - Strategies For Handling and Avoiding False Patent Marking Claims after Forest Group v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:48 am
Osseo Truck Travel Plaza, LLC, 2003 WI App 201, 267 Wis.2d 280, 670 N.W.2d 558. [read post]
3 May 2008, 9:01 pm
Petitioners’ merits brief are due Monday in Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 5:25 am
" You can read excerpts of Barris’ letter, published in the New York Law Journal, here: [www.law.com] To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Trump Plaza Owners, Inc. v WeitznerTo view a copy of the New York County Supreme Court's decisions, please use these links: Dismissal of coop's claims and Grant of injunctive relief [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:46 am by John Diekman
Practice point: Service of a late notice of claim without leave of court is a nullity.Student note: Moreover, the failure to seek a court order excusing such lateness within one year and 90 days after accrual of the claim requires dismissal of the action.Case: Plaza v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) From Bohmfalk v. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 9:30 am
STARK & STARK CASE STUDY CASE NAME: "ABC" Condominium Association v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 5:47 am
At the time of the purchases, the properties were zoned J-2 Business, which permitted the construction of shopping plazas. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:30 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El CIAV atiende a víctimas de trata humana y adultos mayores víctimas de explotación, maltrato físico o emocional. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:48 pm
The Court of Appeals decision last Friday, July 11th in the case of Thomas Williams and Sanford Kelsey v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant’s failure to provide language in such public-facing documents enumerating in detail the aspects of the scope of its representation and making clear that enforcement and collection tasks were not included does not rise to the level of a consumer-oriented misrepresentation or deceptive practice under General Business Law § 349 (see Kickertz v New York Univ., 110 AD3d 268, 273 [1st Dept 2013]; see also Loeb v Architecture Work, P.C., 154 AD3d 616, 616-617… [read post]