Search for: "PLEASANT v. STATE" Results 261 - 280 of 515
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 9:49 pm
Andrew’s Mt Pleasant, it has been because of disagreement with TEC not the direction of the diocese. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 6:53 am
In 2000, the United States Supreme Court decided Troxel v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 3:22 am by Daithí
Graham Linehan), series 2 episode 3 : parody of MPAA video Pretty Woman – 2 Live Crew (fair use / parody) Campbell v Acuff-Rose (1994) 510 US 569 Encore  - DJ Danger Mouse (mashup) Under Pressure – Queen / David Bowie; Ice Ice Baby – Vanilla Ice (sampling/licensing) Barbie Girl – Aqua (trick question – trademark, not copyright) Mattel v MCA (2002) 296 F 3d 894 (9th Circuit CA) Empire State of Mind // Newport (Ymerodraeth… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This reasoning would apply to Title VII retaliation claims as well.The case is Wrobel v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:21 am by Ryan McLane
  The open and obvious doctrine is by no means a new principle of law, however, the Kentucky Court of Appeals just affirmed its broad application in the case Smith v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:44 am
An Aggressive Officer Meets a Rude Citizen: Disorderly Persons Offense State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:20 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Taylor for various acts of misconduct (People v Wildrick, 83 AD3d 1455, 1458, lv denied 17 NY3d 803; People v Morrice, 61 AD3d 1390, 1391-1392; People v Carter, 31 AD3d 1167, 1169), yet the record on this appeal establishes that his misconduct has continued. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
District Court (also in Maryland, as it happens) threw out the indictment in United States v. [read post]