Search for: "Page v. United States et al" Results 261 - 280 of 1,001
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am by SHG
Boutrous, Jr., et al., Petition for Review, Vergara v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
After 16 pages exhorting platforms to “proactively detect, identify and remove illegal content” using algorithms, the report gets to a shorter, separate section on “preventing the re-appearance of illegal content. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
Consent to jurisdiction, which is a required element of a counter-notice under section 512(g)(3)(D), is a meaningful legal concession, and is particularly problematic for users who do not reside in the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
After 16 pages exhorting platforms to “proactively detect, identify and remove illegal content” using algorithms, the report gets to a shorter, separate section on “preventing the re-appearance of illegal content. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm by Daphne Keller
Consent to jurisdiction, which is a required element of a counter-notice under section 512(g)(3)(D), is a meaningful legal concession, and is particularly problematic for users who do not reside in the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 10:31 am by Rachel Bercovitz
In his 94-page ruling, Judge Orlando L. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am by Rachel Bercovitz
A D.C. federal district court judge ruled yesterday in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]