Search for: "Paine v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 6,736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2018, 3:28 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:35 pm
In Angamarca v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:15 am
The Court of Appeals reverses.The case is Bergerson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:09 am
See Baze v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:44 am
A Cook County jury awarded $110,000 in a Chicago car accident lawsuit where the elderly plaintiff required surgery after the accident aggravated her preexisting back problems in Janice Thomson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Fischer v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:15 pm
This week in “Legislation and the Regulatory State,” I taught General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:33 am
Facts: This case (Ostrinsky v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:33 am
Facts: This case (Ostrinsky v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 8:39 am
Defendant successfully challenged the award as excessive and, in Fortune v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:32 am
by Dennis Crouch United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 11:52 am
In 2012, the state defended the statute [text, PDF] by arguing that this stricter regulation would reduce the fetus' likelihood to feel pain and decrease health risks for the women. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 2:29 pm
Yes, if it causes “a stinging sensation” which was set forth in State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 5:57 am
Daniel v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:58 am
The Harbison appeal also argued that, on closer examination, Tennessee’s procedure fails to assure that the inmate will be completely unconscious and thus will does not prevent excruciating pain during the three-drug protocol in use in that state. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 8:59 am
Like this one.The case is Emamian v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:28 am
Casias v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:49 am
These allegations are sufficient to state a claim for legal malpractice (see Garnett v Fox, Horan & Camerini, LLP, 82 AD3d 435, 435 [2011]; see generally Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., 21 AD3d 1082, 1083 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 701 [2005]). [read post]
