Search for: "Park v. USA" Results 261 - 280 of 393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
In 1954, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
In 1954, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 11:21 am by Lyle Denniston
The patent case added to the decision docket is Commil USA v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Brief in opposition (OXY USA Inc., and Union Oil Company of California) Petitioner’s reply Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation (in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-289; 08-294 Title: Horne v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
IPI report Next week in the courts On 16 February 2015, HHJ Parkes QC will hand down judgment in the libel case of Rai v Bholowasia (heard 19-23, and 26 to 27 January 2015) On 17 February 2015, the Court of Appeal (Munby P, Lewison and King LJJ) will give judgment in the case of JX MX (A child proceeding by her Mother and Litigation Friend Mrs AXMX) v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
In 2000 Mance L.J. said in Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland: “Copyright does not lie on the same continuum as, nor is it the antithesis of, freedom of expression. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
USA A Maryland blogger has been forced to pay a “substantial sum” to Melania Trump as part of a settlement for a defamation claim over an article containing unsubstantiated allegations that she once worked as an escort. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
General Motors Corporation et al filed 03/12/07 1:07-cv-01401 Acco Brands USA LLC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 1:34 pm by Joy Waltemath
The court also held the CEO was jointly and severally liable with his company, as he was also a statutory employer under the FLSA (Parks v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St Leonards… [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 20 January 2017, Sir Davie Eady heard applications in the case of Daryanani -v- Ramnani. [read post]