Search for: "Parks v. United States et al"
Results 261 - 280
of 408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
Ambu A/S (Filewrapper) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Convenience of false marking plaintiff ‘in the business of litigation’ given little weight in venue dispute: United States of America, ex rel. et. al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
AIALA, Appellant, v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Example: if the annual gross budget was $75,000, if the HOA could replace all of its major common area components for less than $37,500 they would not be required to have a reserve study, as outlined in §1365, et al. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
Tom King, et al (NFP) - "Although it may have been preferable to consolidate both flooding instances into one lawsuit, each flooding occurrence creates a separate cause of action. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
Environmental law and sustainability after Rio / edited by Jamie Benidickson … [et al.]. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:14 am
J 301 M323 [V. 2] A breviate of parliamentary papers, 1917-1939 / P. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 5:48 am
Parkinson, Jr., et al., No. 12-3342. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
MISHPAJA SHAJINE, INC., et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Goossens H, Giesendorf AJ, Vandamme P, et al. (1995). [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Goossens H, Giesendorf AJ, Vandamme P, et al. (1995). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm
This is a veritable 'Hobson's Choice' involving a decision which, as in the case of Jackson, et al. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:20 am
BP America Production Co., et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm
L. 311 (2013).CPIA import restrictions prohibit designated archaeological and ethnological objects from entering the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:57 am
OCs (Estimated Relative Risk or Odds Ratio with 95% CI) Bloemenkamp et al,[8]1995 Case-Control 2.2 (0.9-5.4) Spitzer (Transnational),[9] 1996 Case-Control 1.5 (1.1-2.2) Bloemankamp et al,[13] 1999 Case-Control 1.9 (0.8-4.5) Jick et al (UK-GPRD),[14] 2000 Cohort/Case-Control 1.9 (1.3-2.8)/2.3 (1.3-3.9) Farley et al (WHO),[6] 1995 Case-Control 2.4 (1.3-4.6) Jick et al (UK-GPRD),[7] 1995 Cohort/Case-Control 1.9… [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
California Department of Fish and Game, et al. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:22 am
Neither party attempted to quantify the risk created by the defendant's conduct; and vague words such as "substantial" are not a satisfactory substitute for data, as we remarked in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
Planning and Conservation League, et al v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:33 am
Plan of the Pillsbury Co., 268 F.3d 456, 459 (7th Cir. 2001) (same); see also Nat’l Assoc. of the Deaf, et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:04 am
For example, in Ocean Trail Unit Owners Ass’n v. [read post]
