Search for: "Pb v. Pc"
Results 261 - 280
of 363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2007, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 4:47 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:24 am
Miller v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
State v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:58 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 6:08 am
Even if the wrong information is excluded, PC remains. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:18 am
Based on the initial consent entry, the officer had PC for a search warrant. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:28 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 2:54 pm
John v. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 10:42 am
Grenci v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:32 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 11:26 pm
September 29, 2009).* State and federal officers may have collective knowledge for PC for a vehicle search. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:39 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:10 pm
The computer check is PC. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:19 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
By the time the officer went under the hood, he had PC. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 4:40 am
September 21, 2009).* Police had PC for defendant’s stop in his car. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:17 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 8:53 am
United States v. [read post]
