Search for: "Peek v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:21 pm
In Tracey v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
In Warshak v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Gillespie v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
Do people actually know their state has decriminalized marijuana? [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Well kids it's time to take a deep breath and breathe breathe breathe, in and out, visualize, close your eyes and inhale slowly as you imagine yourself as a cork on the ocean, drifting ever so slightly across a judicial sea, a calm and peaceful sea, where there are frolicking dolphins and rainbows and lollipops and Judge Schwartz and.....Hi, I see you're back.Well let's just jump right in and take a peek at this week's wonderful world of written utterances:BIV… [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:27 am
CALIFORNIA No peeking behind that curtain. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
Vaughan Jones: An Unpleasant Peek into U.K. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 9:47 am
Crossover Law EnforcementBrown v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 9:47 am
Crossover Law EnforcementBrown v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Do we really need to be concerned that newspapers and the public misunderstand United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:00 am
"[15] The story refers to the recent decision of Green Mountain Chrysler Plymouth Dodge Jeep v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm
The first case is Mississippi v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]Highlights this week included:Chinese company Zhongyi Electronic sues Microsoft for alleged patent infringement relating to technology that converts Roman characters to Chinese characters: (Jurist), (China Hearsay), (IP Dragon),US Patent reform and surrounding controversy: general commentary and opinions: (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent … [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:37 pm
" Romano v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court has developed this concept further since Youngstown; the most frequently cited case is Dames & Moore v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 7:06 pm
For the last several months I have been sharing sneak peeks of a book to be published in early 2021: Hong Kong Between 'One Country' and 'Two Systems': Essays from the Year that Transformed the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (June 2019 – June 2020) (Little Sir Press). [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm
(That case, United States v. [read post]
