Search for: "People of the State of California, ex rel."
Results 261 - 280
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
On the one hand the system of law produced within a state, the sum of which constituted its domestic legal order, was understood to apply directly to individuals and understood as the legitimate expression of popular sovereignty because it proceeded from the people or their representatives in ways sanctioned by the "higher (constitutional) law" of the state. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
I think that oftentimes people refer to infringement as theft in the colloquial sense of the word, but it’s the legal meaning of the term that I will focus on. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Court of Appeal Opinion: People ex rel. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Green, 4 Cal.4th 1187 (1993); People ex rel. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately, depending on your perspective) the holding in American Trucking is very narrow and does not shed much light on the issue before the California Supreme Court in People ex rel. [read post]
31 May 2013, 3:33 pm
Washington (tribal-state compact)California ex rel. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:12 am
Read more about this in People ex rel. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:43 am
” The court drew an analogy to People ex rel. [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:00 am
This issue is before the California Supreme Court in People ex rel. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
The article discusses People ex rel. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am
“That Nothing from Nothing Leaves Nothing”: This refers to People ex rel. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 1:30 pm
In the process, the court states: in all logic, a person directed to [Dr. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:43 am
Even after the war, people filed individual claims. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
In the absence of proof that real people were exposed to products that were unsafe or ineffective (instead of just improperly promoted), there is simply no injury, and thus no standing, for any sort of claim by a TPP or other beneficiary for purely economic loss. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:33 pm
People ex rel. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 7:15 pm
In the California case, U.S. ex rel. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
This figure is relatively often quoted as being the range of the magnitude of the money laundering problem (sometimes “rounded up” to 600 billion)- such as by the FBI. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 6:44 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:49 pm
Because the state has a decent argument that as long as there are some places to live -- as there surely are -- the statute doesn't really burden people's rights. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:19 am
” “[M]ahr amounts can be determined by the bride’s relative worth in relation to other females in the family, her beauty, age, virginity, etc. [read post]
