Search for: "People v Case" Results 261 - 280 of 57,489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2014, 4:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At the close of the prosecution’s case, the defendant requested that the charge be dismissed pursuant to section 330.30 of the CPL. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:06 pm
I've often heard people defending various K-12 speech restrictions by citing Morse v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
Juror John V. himself was convicted of DUI by plea. . . . [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:23 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Imperfect self-defense — Clear error This case arises out of a confrontation during which appellant, David Howard Cochran, ultimately drew his firearm and pointed it toward a group of young people who had gathered on a street in his Baltimore neighborhood. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 3:08 am
"One thing I sometimes hear from clients is why aren't more people prosecuted for perjury, when it seems like someone is lying in their case, if not every case? [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 2:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Bolson Court Discusses Whether a Family Member can be classified as a victim within the meaning of Section 390.30 (3) (b) of the CPL The defendant was convicted of driving while intoxicated but acquitted of manslaughter and vehicular assault. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:57 pm
Does 1-16, the case targeting students at SUNY Albany, defendant's lawyer advised the Court of the recent ruling in a Boston University case, London-Sire Records v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:16 am by InternationalLaw Blogger
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) has filed an application with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in Case No. 12.639, KaliƱa and Lokono Peoples v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am by Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh
Introduction On 13 May 2020, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Adams (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 1:43 pm
People repeatedly complain about cases being resolved on meaningless "technicalities". [read post]