Search for: "People v Francis"
Results 261 - 280
of 474
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2014, 4:41 am
John: People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:10 am
"IP in transition: desperately seeking the Big Picture” is the title of this year's Francis Gurry Lecture, which is to be delivered, hot and spicy, by IPKat blogmeister Jeremy. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:27 pm
, Hale v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm
That’s how the court in Higgins v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 6:45 pm
Not so certain there, William (or Francis!). [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:17 am
Both were professors at the University of Cambridge but in different departments so that the argument might be characterised as Economics v Land Economy. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
” Prosecutor v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 2:51 pm
A little common sense people. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:42 am
From its inception, in 1892, the Pledge has been a slavish ritual of devotion to the state, wholly inappropriate for a free people. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 3:40 pm
Most people recognize Freon as the name for CFCs; it’s the trade name given by DuPont for its brand. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
In People v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:13 pm
In Larson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:32 am
This is a case involving some dark behavior by William Francis Melchert-Dinkel, who visited forums frequented by suicidal individuals and encouraged at least two people to commit suicide. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
According to Brandenburg v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Underwood uses the scandal and misuses various people in order to further his career. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
See Aderhold v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 10:21 am
(Moreover, plaintiff -- Francis Robert -- should count himself lucky (in my book) that unlike Foster Farms, Stanford did not file a cross-appeal about the trial court's decision to only award Stanford $100,000 despite the fact that it incurred $235,000 in fees. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:11 am
ONE v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:24 am
Rumsfeld v. [read post]
