Search for: "People v Justice A." Results 261 - 280 of 22,977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2015, 3:23 pm by Ezra Rosser
This proposal builds upon the Supreme Court’s recent holding in Turner v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 4:50 pm
But to pretend that racism and stereotypes don't play a role in some of the assessments we might make about individual people is, I think, a fair piece naive. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:52 pm
(The caveats in Justice Corrigan's opinion on this point are similarly sensible. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Murphy Court Discusses Whether the Sentence Imposed was Excessive in Driving While Intoxicated Offenses The defendant was convicted of aggravated driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2-a) (b), driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2), and driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3). [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:48 pm
For a good portion of this opinion, based upon its tone and content, I thought that Justice Cornell was going to hold that the gang enhancement here was proper. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 3:29 pm
Because if you don't, you may well engage in conduct that's clearly -- or, as Justice Gomes more tactfully (but equally correctly) puts it, "patently" -- erroneous. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
As the Divisional Court recently said in Bishop v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 2:37 pm
You might not always have been insane; after all, even the most nutty of people tend to have periods of lucidity. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
And, again, I can see why the law might be as Justice Robie concludes it to be.Still. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 11:14 am by Amy Howe
Clayton County, and between Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito and advocate David Cole in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
While seven justices agreed with the Court’s judgment, only four joined the lead opinion, with many justices diverging on the continued relevance of the test set forth in Lemon v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 4:41 am
People are paying even more attention than usual to the Court. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 2:29 pm
As a result, figuring out which particular group of justices you personally agree with is potentially a challenge, but an important one. [read post]