Search for: "People v Leader"
Results 261 - 280
of 4,080
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2023, 12:37 pm
In our post-Roe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 4:50 am
In 2012, in the United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 1:20 pm
Whether the Senator is recognized would seem to be a political question under Baker v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:06 pm
The idea here is as old as those expressed by Henry Ford in the Famous 1919 US case Dodge v Ford: happy, well used and paid workers make great consumers and reduce labor issues even when they can act in concert. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
Pix Credit: William Blake (British, 1757–1827) The Great Red Dragon and the Woman Clothed in Sun (Rev. 12: 1–4), ca. 1803–1805 – Brooklyn Museum The progress of the demonification of Donald Trump continues apace (for an early sense about the arc of this perhaps inevitable passion, see As the Trump Administration Fades into the Shadows of History (and Myth) Lessons Left Unlearned (8 November 202).Donald Trump has been indicted for a third time this year by a… [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
., a publicly traded Brazilian mining company, to resolve charges related to the company’s “allegedly false and misleading disclosures about the safety of its dams prior to the January 2019 collapse of the Brumadinho dam that killed 270 people. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:34 am
Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:23 am
From Trump v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Racial targets are non-binding, voluntary goals, or aspirations—rather than mandatory requirements—made by companies to hire or promote people of color by a future point in time—on a general institutional level—such as among employees, boards of directors, managers, and other leaders. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Racial targets are non-binding, voluntary goals, or aspirations—rather than mandatory requirements—made by companies to hire or promote people of color by a future point in time—on a general institutional level—such as among employees, boards of directors, managers, and other leaders. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am
If you want to really shred precedent, why not start with Marbury v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
That is why other black leaders like Sen. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm
After the Supreme Court invalidated the use of race in college admissions in SFFA v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:38 am
While Huawei v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
” Lebanon On 12 July 2023, a Lebanese court sentenced prominent Lebanese journalist Dima Sadek to one year in prison following a lawsuit by the leader of the Free Patriotic Movement party (FPM) Gebran Bassil. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 2:42 pm
” The new law comes a little over a year after the landmark US Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
In 2019 the U.S. government recognizes the opposition leader as the legitimate president. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:05 am
In April, a coalition of Anishinaabe leaders and environmental advocates – including some of the authors of this article – traveled to the U.N. [read post]
