Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 261 - 280
of 12,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2019, 7:52 am
As a result, I think the problem is rampant throughout every level of government right now. * * * Related posts: * Pres. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 3:37 pm
Brown, People v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:16 am
The state court decision (People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
What is the level of security that the company needs? [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Under the rubric of special needs, the Court has approved of such practices as suspicionless visual strip searches of people entering the general population of a detention facility, in Florence v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:41 pm
People v Nimmons, 95 AD3d 1360, 1360-1361, lv denied 19 NY3d 1028; People v Tucker, 91 AD3d 1030, 1031-1032, lv denied 19 NY3d 1002; People v Ham, 67 AD3d 1038, 1039-1040; People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771, 773, lv denied 7 NY3d 848).Mr. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
In Serra v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 3:15 pm
This is a fine example of why many people hate lawyers. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
Concomitantly, any burden of proof to be imposed upon the People at a risk level classification procedure should be no greater than the burden imposed upon the People at the defendant's time of sentence. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 8:26 am
By Eric Goldman People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:41 pm
Microsoft intervened and ultimately resolved the issue.Finally, Ericsson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:26 am
v=qDC0qcf0kzE [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:36 am
My own view was that this was an obvious due process violation, as the defendant's status as a sex offender was determined at a proceeding which denied him notice and an opportunity to be heard (much as the original SORA classification process struck down in People v David W, 95 NY2d 130 [2000] [holding that the availability of an Article 78 was insufficient to satisfy the requirements of due process as to the level of classification]). [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
No less an authority than the United States Supreme Court declared this a non-issue this year when they denied certiorari in Davis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:19 am
People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 5:59 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
In Woodward v Grice [2017] EWHC 1292 (QB) the High Court considered the appropriate level of damages to award against a fan of the club for libellous statements made on an online forum. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
People v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:07 pm
Borland and Intel v. [read post]
