Search for: "People v Little"
Results 261 - 280
of 13,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am
The truth is a little different. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:09 pm
The circumstances of his crime are more than a little bit nutty, so the case lingers, with numerous inquiries into the defendant's competence to stand trial, and in April 2007, appointed counsel for the defendant -- William Figueroa -- amends the plea to not guilty by reason of insanity. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:36 pm
Seems right to me.I thought that Justice Wiseman might also have added that it'd be a little strange -- and perhaps implicate Fifth Amendment concerns -- if, in that setting, you indeed had an obligation to reveal the drugs in your possession under penalty of a huge felony violation if you remained silent. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:25 pm
The Court of Appeal doesn't mention anything about this exchange, but I'd have dropped a footnote that said we expect a little more circumspection, neutrality and restraint from our judges. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 2:26 pm
Perrusquia sat in his idling car for a minute or so -- which is a little weird -- crouched down, and he had parked his car not in the spots nearest to the 7-11 (and plenty of them were empty), but rather in the spot closest to the exit. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:14 am
And what they might well have meant is to punish extra hard people who molest people younger than ten. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
Super DVD, Inc. (2004) 115 Cal.App.4th 537, 539, fn. 1; People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
Today’s case is Flowers v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
"Taxes for the "little people" are fairly straightforward, and you basically have to pay. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
In Zelasko-Barrett v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am
First, it might indicate that the conservative bloc has little appetite to take aim at Obergefell. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:20 pm
Three years earlier, the California Supreme Court decided a similar case called People v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:52 am
J. thought Danny's messages were "a little too comfortable and playful. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:25 am
People looking to get out early -- if they haven't already -- either physically or psychologically. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Yet the Supreme Court, in Dickerson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:05 am
Shortly after the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 1:33 pm
The reported decision, Dunn v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:30 am
The US Track Federation and the Jamaican Athletics Association announced the start of the USA v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 2:49 am
After the Emergency, the Supreme Court vigorously reinvented itself as the people’s court. [read post]
