Search for: "People v Poole" Results 261 - 280 of 1,397
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
It did so because it was fearful people would get sick from the coronavirus. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
It did so because it was fearful people would get sick from the coronavirus. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:06 am by Jane Turner
Her shows had 250,000 people in the audience and 600,000 podcast downloads per month. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 8:51 am
Covid has killed more than a million people. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 10:45 am by Rich Vetstein
., are lead counsel for several housing providers in a federal court challenge to the Massachusetts Eviction Moratorium in the case of Baptiste v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 12:34 pm by Aaron Mackey
Second, FOSTA expands potential liability for federal sex trafficking offenses by adding vague definitions and expanding the pool of enforcers. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Rather than using his position of power to help people cope with the raging COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 11:10 am by Jennifer Lynch
Earlier this summer, EFF filed an amicus brief in People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am by Camilla Hrdy
For example, he argues that if a company chooses a mark like BABY SAFE for pool fencing, instead of say FENCE-A-POOL, the company can more likely register the mark without proving secondary meaning, since it's not directly descriptive of what the product really does. (26-27).I am not sure this is necessarily true. [read post]