Search for: "People v Richmond" Results 261 - 280 of 450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2008, 3:09 pm
Powell, Jr. wrote in the seminal case of Ford v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 10:44 pm by David Smith
This would mean that the decision in R (Gaskin) v Richmond would be largely irrelevant and local authorities would be less restricted in the charging of HMO licensing fees. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The following are the people, with their former addresses, excluded as of October 20 and October 27, 2010. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
During “Public Private Partnerships: Smooth Sailing or Choppy Waters in the Wake of the Elizabeth River Crossings and VDOT v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 12:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
An alternate school of thought, however, is the less technical rationale presented in People v Modica, 187 Misc 2d 635 (Crim Ct Richmond County 2001), where the court held that "[i]f the elements of the crime or crimes charged are established by the facts contained in the DIR and the DIR, upon inspection by the court, is reasonably referable to the incident alleged in the accusatory instrument, the court may rely on the non-hearsay facts contained in the DIR on… [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 12:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Potterton v Potterton, petitioner sought a writ in Richmond County to have the respondent and their child who resided in Oneida County appears in Richmond County. [read post]