Search for: "People v Samed (Steven)" Results 261 - 280 of 1,394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
 The government said the same thing about depictions of animal cruelty in Stevens. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 1:50 pm by Dale Carpenter
(Much of the history I recount here  comes from Chapter 3 of my book, Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
In The Economist’s “explainer” series, Steven Mazie explains how the Court selects its cases. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
  Many people never realize when their rights are violated, for example, and many people do not have the knowledge or skills to begin to pursue a case to protect their rights. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 3:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
Obriecht's warning did not present the same national security concerns at issue in Haig or form an integral part of the crime as in Lane. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am by Kiran Bhat
Independent Living Center of Southern California, which she characterizes as presenting the question “whether people with limited income and resources can sue states that enact laws which conflict with federal Medicaid requirements, the same way businesses sue states to challenge state consumer protection laws. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Justice Stevens' lead opinion, to its credit, starts with the precedent most at risk in Crawford: the Court's 1966 opinion in Harper v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Justice Stevens' lead opinion, to its credit, starts with the precedent most at risk in Crawford: the Court's 1966 opinion in Harper v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Samuel Green weighs in on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Dean v. [read post]