Search for: "People v South"
Results 261 - 280
of 5,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2013, 4:21 pm
I am sure many people, myself included, have seen the movements on the airwaves and social media discussing the same-sex marriage case out of California. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:17 am
By Adam Thimmesch The major question presented in South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:47 am
Jackson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:19 am
Contents include:Notes and CommentsRamona Vijeyarasa, Flamer-Caldera v Sri Lanka: Asia-Wide Implications of an Essential Evolution in CEDAW's Jurisprudence Articles Natasha Emma Yacoub, A New History of Refugee Protection in Post-World War Two Southeast Asia: Lessons from the Global South Andrea Marilyn Pragashini Immanuel, The Customary Obligation to Avoid, Reduce, or Prevent Statelessness in South Asia Stephen Young, Contesting Subjects: International… [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:32 am
Peña-Irala Dianne Otto, Impunity in a Different Register: People’s Tribunals and Questions of Judgment, Law, and Responsibility Mahmood Mamdani, Beyond Nuremberg: The Historical Significance of the Post-Apartheid Transition in South Africa [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:30 am
It’s been 64 years this week since Brown v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:17 am
A case, TEKsystems, Inc. v Hammernick et al, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota could signify a new trend in unlawful competition litigation in South Africa. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:17 am
A case, TEKsystems, Inc. v Hammernick et al, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota could signify a new trend in unlawful competition litigation in South Africa. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:17 am
A case, TEKsystems, Inc. v Hammernick et al, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota could signify a new trend in unlawful competition litigation in South Africa. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:46 am
In Priority v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
The contributions to this on-line symposium on S.B. 1070 and Arizona v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
In this case the elaboration of tropes around presumptions of collective psychologies of peoples. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 10:39 am
In UMG v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:08 pm
In Maverick v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
Albany Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2014.From Part V, “Paul Robeson and Contemporary South Africa:”“If Paul Robeson was around today, what might he say about the ‘rainbow nation’ and its transformative constitutional project? [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:34 am
In both Elektra v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
His discussion of NAACP v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:02 pm
I had the pleasure of working with Kirk and Celeste during the certification hearings for the National Indian Residential Schools class action, Baxter v. [read post]
