Search for: "People v. Black"
Results 261 - 280
of 5,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2021, 9:54 am
Prison policies like these violate the Supreme Court precedent set in Turner v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am
The two key cases are Province of Bombay v Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay [1947] AC 58 and Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council [1990] 2 AC 580. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:53 am
However, in a landmark 1968 case, Terry v Ohio, the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: In the 1987 decision, McCleskey v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:50 pm
Board), racial bias in the criminal legal system (Powell v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:19 pm
In Arc Mercer, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 3:07 am
Circuit’s recent Frederick Douglass Foundation v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 8:59 pm
Corbello v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Duncan Kennedy, The Bitter Ironies of Williams V. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:43 pm
Actually, the prosecutor eliminated all five black people from a final jury pool of 36 people. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 6:32 am
Three Justices dissent.The case is Tharpe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 7:10 am
It was not a black issue. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 12:01 am
In Beecher v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
In 2017, the ACLU and the law firm of Covington & Burling filed Collins v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 5:27 am
The case is Bey v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Colleen V. [read post]
28 Dec 2024, 6:15 am
The resulting decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 3:27 pm
For most people in the U.S., the threats that they face and the methods by which they are likely to be surveilled or harassed have not changed, but the consequences of digital privacy or security failures may become much more serious, especially for vulnerable populations such as journalists, activists, LGBTQ+ people, people seeking or providing abortion-related care, Black or Indigenous people, and undocumented immigrants. [read post]
