Search for: "People v. Bush" Results 261 - 280 of 2,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2007, 7:26 am
Title IV increases inspection of cargo containers, and Title V addresses aviation security. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:43 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The case involves a confrontation between young people that turns violent is an all-too-familiar way. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 12:33 pm by Tom Parker
The landmark 1980 case Filártiga v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 5:40 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
For more on fair tax v. flat tax v. our current system, click here. 9:53 p.m. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am by Kate Shaw
In its modern form, the idea of the ISLT was first floated in a concurring opinion by Chief Justice Rehnquist in the 2000 opinion in Bush v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Indeed, it has happened before.In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:41 am
On Saturday, I criticized Jeb Bush’s stated criteria for choosing judges as what has led to continued disappointment by conservatives in Republican nominated justices. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:49 am
Under the Bush administration's approach, partly ratified by Congress, such people can be imprisoned indefinitely, perhaps for life, without ever seeing a judge or jury, based on slapdash military hearings with no defense lawyers, no real opportunity to confront the evidence against them -- which can be obtained through coercive interrogation -- and all-too-cursory judicial review. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Though it is less well known, and before it became politically necessary for now-jurists John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to dutifully carry out their part of the 2000 Republican strategy that resulted the 5-4 Bush v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 6:55 pm
The only times I have broken this norm have been to deny the suggestion that occasionally surfaced in the right-wing press that as a law clerk I brainwashed Justice Kennedy into not voting to overturn Roe v. [read post]