Search for: "People v. Chase" Results 261 - 280 of 1,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
To make matters worse, the Supreme Court pulled the rug out from under decades of effective voting rights protections in its decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:33 am by The Charge
 - United States Constitution, Amendment 4 There is great consensus that the 1765 case of Entick v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 9:09 am by tc
The logic is: If you don’t chase at high speeds, people are much less likely to drive at high speeds where doing so puts many people at risk. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:32 am
Likewise, it’s wrong for people — including people who are apparently military members — to chase down someone who is carrying a flag upside down, apparently trying to take it from him. [read post]
3 May 2014, 12:30 pm
" Using the awful  2007 Supreme Court decision in Scott v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 11:10 am by Law Offices of Rudolph E. Loewenstein
Byrd (People v Byrd, July 29, 2016, D.A.R. 7772), the strict requirements of proof worked to his advantage. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 11:10 am by Law Offices of Rudolph E. Loewenstein
Byrd (People v Byrd, July 29, 2016, D.A.R. 7772), the strict requirements of proof worked to his advantage. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 11:10 am by Law Offices of Rudolph E. Loewenstein
Byrd (People v Byrd, July 29, 2016, D.A.R. 7772), the strict requirements of proof worked to his advantage. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
”According to the New York State Court of Appeals, “escape” typically means to “get away, break away, get free or get clear, with conscious purpose to evade custody,” and since Antwine broke free of the realm of custody without authorization –- forcing police to give chase and placing an officer and the public at risk –- there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction in question.Clearly, there was no escaping… [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:04 am by David G. Badertscher
White RICHMOND COUNTYCriminal Practice Supreme Court IDV Part Retains Jurisdiction To Preside Over Misdemeanor Criminal Cases People v. [read post]