Search for: "People v. Clinton"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,255
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Judge Tatel indicates his view that this case is closer to Clinton v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:36 am
The census citizenship question case (New York et al. v Dep't of Commerce, back in the SDNY after remand from the Supreme Court in June) has taken a strange new turn. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:22 pm
Neither did Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
So too, in Flowers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:34 am
Related Cases: Lexmark v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Few people feel that way today. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am
The people do not elect the heads of agencies, but they do elect the president. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
But I continue to believe that the 1968 and 1992 elections, to mention only two especially significant post-World War II elections (and not, for example, the 1912 or 1860 elections), present their own problems inasmuch as the two winners, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, had the demonstrated support of only 43% of the population, and, of course, were faced as well by a “divided” Congress in which at least one house was controlled by the opposition party. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 10:01 am
On November 8, 2016, for example, Judge Kwan wrote a lengthy post on voter participation, which opened, "Dear Generation X and Millennial Voters, So many people have tried to convince you of the importance of your participation in this year's election…. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
The resolutions authorizing both the Nixon and Clinton impeachment proceedings granted the judiciary committee this authority. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:56 am
In that ruling, the Court said that Congress lacked the general power to inquire into people’s private lives. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 11:13 am
Hey, it worked for President Clinton, didn’t it? [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:49 pm
” Nixon v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:49 pm
” Nixon v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:43 pm
These number about 12 people. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
., the President’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, campaign chairman Paul Manafort, and at least five other people, including a lawyer connected to the Russian government who promised “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Many people acknowledge that Reagan would not be nearly conservative enough for today’s Republican Party, yet the press cannot resist labeling as “moderates” conservative extremists like Susan Collins (who actually believes, among other things, that tax cuts pay for themselves—and who claimed to believe that Brett Kavanaugh would not overturn Roe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
The Assange indictment may seem reminiscent of the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co v. [read post]
