Search for: "People v. Commissioners" Results 261 - 280 of 2,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by NARF
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Treaty Rights; Indian Taxation) United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Commissioners of Land Office, 149 N.Y. 26, 43 N.E. 418; Matter of Guzzetta v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 6:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case asks when is someone a "prisoner" under the PLRA.The case is Gibson v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 12:15 pm by Unknown
Blog posts & press:Call for the EU to Protect Displaced People During the COVID-19 Crisis (May 2020) [text]- Advocacy letter to EU agencies.COVID-19: Asylum Applications Down by 43% in March (EASO, April 2020) [text]Expelled from Humanity: Reflections on M.N. and Others v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 10:06 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  Moreover, the Project adversely impacts the goal of regionalization which is a centerpiece of the Stipulated Settlement signed by the Petitioners in City of El Segundo, et al. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was also handed down on meaning in Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company v HarperCollins and Catherine Belthon [2021] EWHC 3141 (QB), the second libel claim to result from Putin’s People (above). [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 7:59 am by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:37 am by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
., 2015 QCCS 6555 https://t.co/ykzcuw3Ux2 -> Another case examining scope of Statute of Monopolies Apotex Inc. v Schering Corporation, 2016 ONSC 3407 https://t.co/ABAeS7Hifa -> Internet service providers, First Nations gird for fight over Quebec’s gambling law https://t.co/z4oDtznuLg -> TREB seeks ‘opt-in’ consent for MLS data to protect consumer privacy https://t.co/gyjeVz3KPR -> Four people plead guilty in theft and sale of maternity records… [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:14 pm by Venkat
Several courts have said as much in the defamation context (see DiMeo v Max, Finkel v Dauber, and more recently, Sandals Resorts v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:26 am by Geoff Schweller
Currently, as ruled by the Supreme Court in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am by Eleanor Mitchell, Matrix
This was the standard that had been applied in Burnip, and was said to find further support in the Supreme Court’s decision in Humphreys v Revenue and Customs Commissioners. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
On 7 December 2011, the judge gave his full reasons for making this unusual order (Law Society (and others) v Rick Kordowski [2011] EWHC 3185 (QB)). [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 1:34 pm
Some people say there is no way this order will stand, that it will be appealed. [read post]