Search for: "People v. Cruz"
Results 261 - 280
of 316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2022, 6:06 am
As early as 2016 he was touting extensive voter registration fraud potentially involving thousands of people in his home state of Indiana, although no evidence was found to back the claims. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm
That means it is unconstitutional, whether or not Roe v Wade is re-engineered or overruled.This revolting endangerment of young girls’ lives is particularly troubling when considering the irrational measures taken by Texas officials in dealing with COVID-19, which as of last month included Governor Abbott’s executive order banning the use of vaccine mandates in the public sector and Senator Ted Cruz’s proposed federal legislation banning mask mandates, vaccine… [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
The correct answer is “Supreme Court decision in Young v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 1:36 pm
Today, in Cruz v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
Yet these obvious comparisons didn’t even occur to the judges.In Tully v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 2:38 pm
It doesn’t have the right senior people working together as peers…. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Gibraltar The GBC had a report on the hearing in the hearing in the Gibraltar Court of Appeal in the case of Cruz v Financial Services Commission. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
The term “constitutional conservative,” in fact, was coined to describe people like Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee, who hold themselves out as the arbiters of constitutional correctness. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 5:20 am
We are ordinary people trying to solve extraordinary problems. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 5:15 am
— Alex Gurevich (@alex_gurevich) July 21, 2022 Some people may gloat over how Meta/Facebook was impacted by this. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 10:52 am
Cruz continues to publicly misrepresent Section 230. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
Justice Alito then turned to the famous case of Ricci v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
" Presumably, these "very fine people" included those who carried Nazi swastikas, racist signs and torches, and shouted slogans like "Jews will not replace us. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 4:32 pm
See Hearst v Ganzi (2006) 145 CA4th 1195. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:15 pm
The report reveals more than 500 clean water enforcement cases that have been dropped or stalled in the wake of the 2006 decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 12:18 pm
Thirteen years ago this tension came before the Court in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 10:27 am
Making race-based jury selection decisions in violation of Batson v. [read post]
