Search for: "People v. Finger"
Results 261 - 280
of 823
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2012, 4:23 am
The case- People v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
That post's thrust has been bolstered by this guest post by Thomas Farkas.Posting comments on the IPKat: a new policyDon't go on and on being anon, the Kats say: people struggle to work out who you are. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:32 am
Under Florida v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:56 am
People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 3:23 pm
When I read the Apple v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:59 am
Most people know that getting up on a ladder can be dangerous, and most people know that sticking your hand in a lawnmower while it’s running not only makes you Captain of the Dummy Team, but can cost you several fingers. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in, R. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
In Smith v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:00 pm
The state Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Jan. 18 in the case of State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:52 am
Managing Intellectual Property magazine is compiling its annual list of the 50 most influential people in the field of intellectual property this year. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 11:55 am
After all, if the people in charge of making our laws can’t respect them, why should anyone else? [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 7:20 am
Blehm v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
In Miree v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 3:58 am
The text "guilty of misleading the American public" was at issue in the Lanham Act case Groden v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:30 am
As a result the ECJ handed down its judgment in September this year.The case of Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd (European Court of Justice) dealt with an application for a trademark by Nestle for a three-dimensional representation of the Kit Kat bar, omitting the embossed words "Kit Kat" from the top of the chocolate bar's individual fingers. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:05 am
Supreme Court's unanimous opinion in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
In Schroer v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:10 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
The decision in Reidel v. [read post]
