Search for: "People v. Floyd"
Results 261 - 280
of 419
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2021, 2:57 am
Protests began in Los Angeles County following the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd on May 25, 2020. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am
But Roosevelt’s success depended largely on his ability to keep people guessing. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:00 am
Leaked Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:13 pm
AustraliaX v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:11 am
(relisted after the October 6, October 13, October 27, November 3, November 9 and November 21 conferences) Floyd v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am
On 14 December 2010 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Pink Floyd Music Limited v EMI Records ([2010] EWCA Civ 1429) – a contractual dispute concerning downloading of music to iTunes. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
This led to the revision of Section 1237 through the Floyd D. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:23 pm
Estes v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:48 am
"] From yesterday's Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision in Gierl v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
Talking of Mr Justice Arnold, that very same judge drew the Kats' attention to a recent Patents Court for England and Wales decision of Mr Justice Floyd in Daiichi Sankyo v Comptroller of Patents in which Novartis was not allowed to join this case as a party in order to participate in its reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In Robinson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:04 am
A court ruled that “stop-and-frisk” violated the Fourth Amendment in Floyd v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:28 am
See all stories on this topic  People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 9:15 pm
Floyd, 385 U.S. 116, 124 (1966). [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
And these were people hellbent on killing and destroying people’s lives. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
“Hmm”, mused Merpel, “the lengths which some people will go to in order to secure the referee of their choice never ceases to amaze. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
Back in the High Court, on 7 October 2013 Lord Justice Floyd (as he now was) issued an order that restrained TV Catchup from retransmission via its streaming services without obtaining a licence from the broadcasters (ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5). [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
We lawyers have to keep such secrets about people as part of our jobs, but we're used to it, and we're handsomely compensated for it. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Thanks to Floyd Abrams, Lyrissa Lidsky, and Ken White for their guidance on speci [read post]
