Search for: "People v. Friedman"
Results 261 - 280
of 616
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Riggs v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In a 1950 California case, State Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 6:51 am
(See Self v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:42 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:38 pm
This is because Craddock v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:44 am
Looking ahead to this fall’s oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:19 am
Barry Friedman is the Jacob D. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:55 am
That is, the question should be, to what extent was the expression specific and unique, but people are much more apt to employ a bright line rule based on the number of identical words. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:55 pm
Circuit issued its long-awaited ruling in Friedman v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:23 pm
Straniere said in a recent case, faced with that situation: This is another case which is slowly convincing me that I am the judge in the 'Sixth Sense' part of the [New York] Civil Court where, like characters in that film who only see dead people, I am relegated to seeing cases with 'dead corporations' represented by 'dead law firms.' Centurion Capital Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:33 am
Supreme Court's opinion in Williams v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:45 am
The Bad: Too many people selling, not enough people buying. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
In Armour v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:17 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:39 pm
Howard Friedman (Religion Clause) for the pointer. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:21 am
(Eugene Volokh) In R. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:09 am
Today's Court of Appeals decision (People v Kent #70, 5/8/12) has two very important components. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
The Court also released an opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:53 am
(Eugene Volokh) So holds Stand Up For America Now v. [read post]
