Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 261 - 280
of 17,530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2020, 1:05 pm
You're a witness and are given immunity. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
A legislator might think that guards are generally good people; that they operate under stress; that they generally do things for good (rather than bad) reasons; and that even when they make mistakes, they should generally be forgiven, or at least have the option of being forgiven. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:38 am
To be sure, the Court in WV v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:18 am
But the dissent makes a strong case that $350 limits are unconstitutionally low, given Randall v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Protecting People from Their Own Religious Communities: Jane Doe in Church and State
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Decker v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 11:50 am
Given its stock-in-trade in trashing people, I'm a little surprised we don't have more lawsuits relating to it. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
People v Kirkland, 89 NY2d 903, 904–905). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:51 pm
And I have serious concerns that, at least in some cases (though by no means in most of them), that decision might even result in people innocent of an offense being convicted. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:26 pm
The trial court was there, the trustee definitely did some bad stuff, there's an attorney fee provision in the statute, and given all of the above, what the trial court did makes sense. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:11 am
The result in Snyder v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 3:14 am
People v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:04 am
But the world seems to have overlooked the implications of Thomson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:14 am
That said, I'm certainly not going to say it's unreasonable given California precedent. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
(This seems a quite reasonable assumption given the facts of this particular case, by the way.) [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 2:35 pm
In Ghiselli v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:39 am
People v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 3:55 am
Donny Kevin Davis v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:41 pm
But a case from last year, Brennan v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:35 pm
See United States v. [read post]
