Search for: "People v. Greenfield"
Results 261 - 280
of 289
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2008, 12:49 am
Liggett v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 4:48 pm
I noted all the commentary in the legal blogosphere over it, as Chief Justice Roberts stepped aside in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 11:41 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari today in the "Fantasy Baseball" case of CBC Distribution v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 8:50 pm
--Capital Defense Weekly has a cool new design too, and a wrap-up of discussion on last week's Snyder v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
Anyway, it does seem that Senator Hillary Clinton will be busy, and the people in New York will be led by sports commentator Tommy Smyth. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 4:44 am
Yesterday an appellate court reversed and demanded he stand trial.The appellate decision in People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 9:56 pm
" After Roe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
Coordinators have assisted over 300 families this year, and have a presence with Title V, P & A, CHIP, the Child Find Policy and Practice Committee, the Governor's Chronic Illness Task Force and the Family Resource Connection (devoted to early childhood issues)! [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 7:11 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
The citation for the Santorelli case you list is People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 1:49 pm
A post here awhile back wondered if two Supreme Court cases were heading for conflict: Witherspoon v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 1:49 pm
Scott Greenfield was already asking tough questions about juries (he always starts with "I really like Anne Reed's blog, but . . . [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 4:09 pm
Over at Simple Justice, Scott Greenfield has an astonishing post about a criminal case that deserves much wider attention: People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
It's an unfortunate fact of life that there are a lot of prescription drugs out there that people can also use to get high. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 10:51 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 1:18 am
But some V-6s I've seen charge a boatload of money to sell their clients down the river. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
It seems to me that there must be a better expression to describe the latter (I'll try to find it as I write this) but the distinction between the lawyers who defend people because they have a passion for the fight (the criminal defense lawyers) and the lawyers who represent the accused because of a business decision (V-6s?) [read post]
