Search for: "People v. Hale" Results 261 - 280 of 381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2012, 2:26 am by Michael Scutt
Homer v West Yorkshire Police is about indirect age discrimination. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:03 am by Alasdair Henderson
Lady Hale dissented and would have found for the employees in both case. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am by Dr. Stuart Baran
Lord [Sky]Walker and Lord Collins wrote the judgment of the court, with Lady Hale and Lord Phillips agreeing in full. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm by Dave
 Baroness Hale/Lord Walker are quite amusing about the foundational case, Gissing v Gissing [1971] AC 886 noting that “their Lordships speeches were singularly unresponsive to each other” (at [28]), but then the hard work begins. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Graeme Hall
Lady Hale, the only female Justice, has certainly been vocal of late. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:12 am by Lucy Reed, St John's Chambers.
I was able to slip in part way through the afternoon session, and whilst I was there a number of people slipped silently in, and out, assisted by a friendly security guard on the door. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:12 am by Lucy Reed, St John's Chambers.
I was able to slip in part way through the afternoon session, and whilst I was there a number of people slipped silently in, and out, assisted by a friendly security guard on the door. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 1:48 pm by familoo
I was able to slip in part way through the afternoon session, and whilst I was there a number of people slipped silently in, and out, assisted by a friendly security guard on the door. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  What has been protected is not, in any true sense, “public interest journalism” but is much more akin to what Baroness Hale once called “vapid tittle tattle”. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm by INFORRM
Judgment was handed down today in the case of Ferdinand v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 2454 (QB)). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
Judgment Their Lordships held, by a majority (Lady Hale dissenting), that the appeal should be dismissed. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:33 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Under the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970, s 2(1) disabled people have a right to practical assistance from their local authority to meet their needs. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am by Rosalind English
Option 1 was rejected as too narrow, leaving the possibility that serious errors of law affecting large numbers of people would go uncorrected. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:42 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
In a February 9, 2011 post I discussed the case of Too Much Media LLC v. [read post]