Search for: "People v. House"
Results 261 - 280
of 12,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Then, the justices read a summarized version of two opinions they were announcing for the day, which included Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
Though the article is set to appear in print sometime this month, it might not beat the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
In defining that test, the Supreme Court in Joseph relied heavily on the decision of the House of Lords of Kemsley v Foot [1952] A.C. 345. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
What they did have in common was a goal: to keep President-elect Lincoln from the White House. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
The clause was created in reference to a real Civil War in which over 750,000 people died in combat. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
In Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:59 am
Here is the complaint: Carano v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
That argument isn’t at issue in the case: Everyone agrees that if Donald Trump was subject to Section 3 as President, and if he engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021, then that conduct rendered him legally ineligible to serve as President or in the other covered state and federal offices (absent action by two-thirds of both houses of Congress to eliminate that disability). [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:23 am
The leading case Labar v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
United States and, most recently, in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee’s report on Large Language Models has concluded it is not “fair for tech firms to use rightsholder data for commercial purposes without permission or compensation, and to gain vast financial rewards in the process”. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
Property v. property: TM v. domain names; land v. chattels; IP v. consumer goods. [read post]