Search for: "People v. Jose" Results 261 - 280 of 514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
These rules flow out of two primary sources, the law on liquidated damages and the appellate case of Orozco v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:00 am
See Related Blog Posts:Summer Safety Primer: Avoiding Accidental Pool DrowningsNalwa v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:32 am
However, the court stated that if the investor could fashion the claim to circumvent SLUSA preemption, a claim for restitution of the fees paid the company could be recovered as restitution.The March 8 decision is Smit v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 pm by Barry Barnett
What about the third link in the chain -- the people who own and lease the servers, bandwidth, and IP addresses from their offices in San Jose, CA? [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:12 am by Jon Ibanez
The First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco relied on the 2006 California Supreme Court ruling of People v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:43 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Yesterday the California Supreme Court heard oral argument in Briggs v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 8:42 am
Today in People v Nieves-Andino, 2007 NY Slip Op 05584, the Court of Appeals held there was such an emergency under the following circumstances. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:59 pm by Florian Mueller
I wasn't nearly as "pro-Apple" or "anti-Android" as some people made me out to be, but when I said something positive for Apple, it reaffirmed many people's beliefs, and when I said something positive for Android, it didn't fit into the picture. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:52 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Little surprise the defendant in this particular case, Suffolk County, lost: the New York wrongful death statute was meant to support people like Jose A. [read post]