Search for: "People v. Justice" Results 261 - 280 of 25,617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2014, 4:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
According to People v Ellis, 169 AD2d 838, 839 [1991] it was held that where the defendant was driving in an erratic manner, it constituted a sufficient reason to justify an initial stop by an officer. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 1:35 pm
  By contrast, Justice Dhanidina sees his opinion (Wilson, on the other side of the split) eviscerated and, ultimately, expressly disapproved. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm by Lawrence Solum
Ben Cohen (The Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race and Justice and The Justice Center's Capital Appeals Project) have posted Redemption Song: Graham v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:40 pm by Karen Gullo
  For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/microsoft-v-justice-department-amicus-brief About this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/microsoft-v-department-justice   Contact:  LeeTienSenior Staff Attorney and Adams Chair for Internet Rightslee@eff.org SophiaCopeStaff Attorneysophia@eff.org Share this: Join EFF [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
As the Divisional Court recently said in Bishop v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:14 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
On August 26, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court published its opinion in People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:23 pm by Ezra Rosser
This proposal builds upon the Supreme Court’s recent holding in Turner v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 3:29 pm
Because if you don't, you may well engage in conduct that's clearly -- or, as Justice Gomes more tactfully (but equally correctly) puts it, "patently" -- erroneous. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 2:48 pm
For a good portion of this opinion, based upon its tone and content, I thought that Justice Cornell was going to hold that the gang enhancement here was proper. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:52 pm
(The caveats in Justice Corrigan's opinion on this point are similarly sensible. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 4:50 pm
But to pretend that racism and stereotypes don't play a role in some of the assessments we might make about individual people is, I think, a fair piece naive. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 11:14 am by Amy Howe
Clayton County, and between Justices Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito and advocate David Cole in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Murphy Court Discusses Whether the Sentence Imposed was Excessive in Driving While Intoxicated Offenses The defendant was convicted of aggravated driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2-a) (b), driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2), and driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3). [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 4:41 am
People are paying even more attention than usual to the Court. [read post]