Search for: "People v. Lyle" Results 261 - 280 of 315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2025, 12:33 am by INFORRM
Newspaper Journalism and regulation Over 60,000 people have reportedly lodged complaints about a GB News broadcast in which presenter Josh Howie suggested that a church’s commitment to the “full inclusion of LGBTQ+ persons” would also include pedophiles. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 1:58 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On Tuesday 18 February 2025, there was an appeal hearing in the case of Mullen v Lyles KA-2024-000119. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Lyle Denniston on the Supreme Court’s scotusblog suggests that the court has effectively “launched years of new lawsuits to sort it all out”, and the increasing use of technology in law-enforcement, and in other private areas of people’s lives, seems to indicate that this will be fertile ground for future litigation. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 3:11 pm by Lyle Denniston
After 88 minutes of hearing, in the high-profile civil rights case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 3:55 am by Lyle Denniston
This is the way the Justices put it in the 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]
5 May 2025, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has an article analysing the recent  case of Mullen and Lyles [2025] EWHC 645 (KB) decided by Fordham J. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:34 am by Lyle Denniston
”  It would happen in a case that was aptly named New York Times Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 1:29 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was a hearing of a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Lyles v Mullen KA-2024-000111. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
(SCOTUSblog's Lyle Denniston asks: "Can constitutional issues be finessed? [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:49 am by Lyle Denniston
Wade, which Kennedy helped to keep largely intact when it came under a heavy challenge in 1992, and Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:58 am by Lyle Denniston
It did so in one of its closing-day rulings on free-speech rights in Janus v. [read post]