Search for: "People v. Madison"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
Along with Van Cleve, I also assigned Federalist 40, written by Madison, in which Madison defends, plausibly or not, the extraordinarily powers seized by the Framers in Philadelphia when measured against both the rather limited mandate of Congress--to suggest "revisions" in the Articles of Confederation--and, more importantly, the constraints of Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation, which required the assent of the legislatures of every one of the states… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:30 am
” Kavanaugh cited Marbury v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
Madison case. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:13 am
Wainwright, Brown v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:35 pm
Madison (which established the power of the Supreme Court to declare laws unconstitutional) and Brown v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(Harvard University Press, 2020), and Jesse Wegman, Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College (St. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 4:03 pm
You do not work for Madison, or any other unelected entity—our government is of the people, by the people, and for the people. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:51 pm
Madison) (Jacob E. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
I read Madison as offering the quite implausible hope that the new Constitution can endure as a “republican” order, basically by limiting the power of “we the people”; he proudly states in Federalist 63 that a central feature of the new constitutional order is that all governance will be done exclusively through “representatives” and none whatsoever by “the people” themselves. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 2:34 pm
LSAT v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:31 pm
Madison. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
He views Justice Marshall, in the 1803 Marbury v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 2:40 pm
Comer, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:57 am
The remaining category of American religious-liberty controversies involves exemptions for religious exercise and accommodations for religious people. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:43 am
Because the majority lost the traditional ideal, defended by the dissenters and James Madison, that people should not be required to pay taxes to support other religions. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:01 am
Madison) (describing the “power over the purse” as the “most compleat and effectual weapon” in representing the interests of the people). [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
” Either way, according to Madison, they have not been “the guardians of the liberties of the people. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:02 am
Before Brown v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
E.g., Ziglar v. [read post]
