Search for: "People v. Merchant" Results 261 - 280 of 575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2020, 8:57 am by Venkat Balasubramani
: Password-sharing is a “ubiquitous, useful, and generally harmless” activity that “millions of people” engage in, United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:17 am
Subscription Required NEW YORK COUNTYCivil Practice Court Grants Class Certification; 300,000 Small Business Merchants Establish Numerosity Pludeman v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Sheff: question is ex ante costs of rigor v. ex post costs of resolving conflicts; reasonable people disagree. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:02 am by Kristian Soltes
According to the company, personal information belonging to more than 100 million people was compromised in the breach. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
 The courts ultimately said “no,” see Abigail Alliance v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:43 pm
" -- Notes by Edward Gordon Vázquez Menchaca, Fernando (1512-1569). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am by Florian Mueller
Another one, which is extremely important here, is the one between "merchant" chipset makers that sell their products to others and companies like Huawei (with its wholly-owned HiSilicon subsidiary) and Samsung (with its Exynos division) that build baseband chipsets more or less exclusively for their own devices.Intel and Qualcomm are "merchant" suppliers: they sell to others, and that's their business. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
The law isn’t limited to people who are in prison or on probation (whose First Amendment rights are sharply reduced because of that); it applies even to people who had finished serving their sentences. [read post]