Search for: "People v. Paris" Results 261 - 280 of 596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
And with respect to the President, in particular, it is what undergirds the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Washington explained the core to Jefferson in far off Paris, saying he would not much object to any of the Anti-Federalist proposed amendments on rights, but he objected to their proposed prohibition of federal direct tax, “which is the one they most strenuously insist on. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Kenneth also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
I actually took a year off between college and law school, living in Paris, studying international relations, and traveling for months all over Europe, including, in addition to the usual places, two weeks in the Soviet Union over Christmas and hitchhiking treks through Brittany and Ireland. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:52 am by pscamp01
Harlan was 26 years old at the time and young Harlan the slaveholder was quite a different man than Harlan the author of the Plessy v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Which is to say it wants to prevent other people from using the mark in expressive ways such as on T-shirts and mugs. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
This was cause for Nixon’s concern, and his scheme to block the peace talks from occurring.Per the notes, which I have translated and summarized, Nixon instructed Haldeman that Bryce “Harlow [should be] monitoring [the situation in] V[iet] Nam. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 5:55 am by SHG
Does it make more sense that an American elected official put the interests of Syrian refugees in Paris ahead of his constituents in Idaho? [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 7:43 pm
In tale caso, il quorum è pari alla maggioranza dei votanti alle ultime elezioni della Camera. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:39 pm by Quinta Jurecic
It’s been a year since the Paris attacks at the Bataclan concert hall and elsewhere in the city. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Not new: goes back to 1883 Paris Convention. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:49 am by Zachary Burdette
Similarly, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg emphasized that the United States has a treaty obligation under Article V to defend its allies in Europe from foreign aggression, noting that Article V has only been invoked following the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
  Hysteria broke out across the Europhobic tabloid press with the judges being dubbed “the enemies of the people”. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
  This role was exposed in last week’s judgment in R v Norman ([2016] EWCA Crim 1564) which was discussed on the Panopticon blog Roy Greenslade in the Guardian said that the “wrong people were prosecuted over journalists’ payments to police,” and that the police should have been investigating Rupert Murdoch’s publishing business instead of France. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:45 am by Victoria Kwan
That’s what I think people try to do. [read post]