Search for: "People v. Perez"
Results 261 - 280
of 377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2008, 4:59 pm
What, if any, are the minimum, constitutionally-guaranteed substantive attributes or rights that are embodied within the fundamental constitutional “right to marry” that is referred to in cases such as Perez v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
On appeal, in Perez v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:53 am
Its decision in Perez v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:21 pm
And Congress improperly “delegates”—or, more precisely, authorizes the exercise of, [see Thomas’s concurrence in the judgment in Monday’s other case, Perez v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am
Wuerth notes that in the 2015 case of Sachs v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:06 pm
Supreme Court in 1964 in McLaughlin v. [read post]
2021 Virtual Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy: Theme and Program
20 Jul 2021, 6:52 am
Realities”Denisse Delgado Vázquez, University of Massachusetts, Boston, “Cuban Newcomers: Their Economic Behavior and Political Motivations” [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
(relisted after the January 13, January 19 and February 17 conferences) Perez v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 10:42 am
Perez v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:37 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm
Wirtz, 392 U.S., at 190 , 198; Perez v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 7:22 am
Perez as “inconsistent” with the Reagan/Meese view. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am
In Perez as next friend of F.V. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 1:37 pm
(relisted after the January 13, January 19, February 17 and February 24 conferences) Perez v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:53 am
AFSCME, arguing that “compelling people to give money, by itself, is not a First Amendment problem but is rather akin to taxation. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 9:39 am
* Abrams v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:25 am
Because the ALJ ignored the weight of scientific evidence and the full OSHA Review Commission declined to intervene, the appeals court granted the employer’s petition for review and vacated the citation (Caterpillar Logistics, Inc v Perez, December 12, 2013, Easterbrook, F). [read post]
