Search for: "People v. Polite" Results 261 - 280 of 13,516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2013, 2:49 am
The role of and the relationship between the judiciary and politics need to be reassessed. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 1:35 pm
It might well be the case -- I don't know for sure -- that up north, any legal fight about the fate of People's Park is necessarily (or easily) viewed as a political fight. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 12:01 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
Paul Wilson, translator of several of Václav Havel’s works, including his celebrated Letters to Olga (1983/1988), and one-time member of the underground band, The Plastic People of the Universe, has an eloquent and moving remembrance in the latest issue of the New York Review of Books: [….] [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 8:16 am
 Because as we like to say, if they can stop a farmer from selling the wheat he grows (Wickard v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:21 pm
And indeed many restrictions focus on particular places — sidewalks outside people’s homes (Frisby v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm by Lovechilde
  In a welcome contrast to AIPAC, it "gives political voice to mainstream American Jews and other supporters of Israel who, informed by their Jewish values, believe that a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is essential to Israel’s survival as the national home of the Jewish people and as a vibrant democracy. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:18 am by Supreme People's Court Monitor
For those with the ability (or at least the patience) to decode Supreme People’s Court (SPC) President Zhou Qiang’s March, 2018 report to the National People’s Congress, it provides insights into the Chinese courts, economy, and society, and of course politics. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 5:44 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes Corporate Political Speech: Who Decides? [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:09 am by traceydennis
Regina (Conservative and Unionist Party) v Election Commissioner [2010] EWCA Civ 1332; [2010] WLR (D) 296 “It was not open to a petitioner to an election court to seek an order for costs under s 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 against the respondent’s political party and its local party association who had not been parties to the petition. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
The statute, if enacted, would in effect criminalize normal democratic politics. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
 Critics fear the Tories will now move to cripple Ofcom — and then quietly relax the restrictions on Sky News … THE PRESS GANG campaign — The People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 5:58 am by Howard Wasserman
The real reasons for restricting access are the same--the people they want to win will not win if there is broad access (Republican candidates v. governments/businesses/persons who engage in wrongdoing). [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 9:49 am
Via rjmac at daily kos, Bruce [Springsteen, for those not in the know] goes political, early, because it's late for our country: This is a song called Livin' In the Future. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:19 am by Calvin Massey
  The Westboro people show us how expensive it can be. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:32 pm
"Q and A: A Case of Economics and Politics. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:22 am
I'll broadly generalize the argument in Friedrichs as: Any time a public union is negotiating with the state, it is engaging in political speech; and forcing people to pay fees to support that activity violates their First Amendment rights. [read post]