Search for: "People v. Reid" Results 261 - 280 of 333
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2010, 8:17 am
" J Choo v Towerstone [2008] the case where the IPKat's friend, Jacqueline Reid, was counsel for the claimant was again trotted out as being one of the best design right cases in the UK. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:13 pm by charonqc
The restriction confirmed by the courts in Whaley v Lord Watson 2000 (later confirmed by the House of lords). [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 7:22 am by Glenn Reynolds
It doesn’t occur to them that his poll number are (among other reasons) dropping because liberals are angry that Obama/Reid/Pelosi haven’t worked harder to advance the progressive agenda. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:01 pm by Steve Bainbridge
23) Bill Clinton (7)--GOPers still mad because he beat the crap out of them; sour grapes23) Hillary Clinton (7)--I don't like her, but I think she's making a good Secretary of State19) Michael Moore (7)--agree19) George Soros (8)--maybe top 4019) Alger Hiss (8)--the traitors are way to low on this list19) Al Sharpton (8)--eh13) Al Gore (9)--depends on whether global warming is as bad as he thinks it is13) Noam Chomsky (9)--annoying to be sure, but not in top 2013) Richard Nixon (9)--fair… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:30 am by Luke Gilman
Harry Reid v Angle http://ow.ly/28pzI # picking my jaw up off the floor after seeing this amazing wall-painted stop-motion animation http://ow.ly/28qaq # Rosen has a great article on the original people's lawyer in Why Brandeis Matters, http://ow.ly/28qQ7 # RT @jon_bartelson @taxgirl RT @twiteconomy: #NYT Stephen Colbert on Law School Grade Inflation http://bit.ly/bzMezL // hilarious # HPD policy forbids officers from talking to defense lawyers without OK… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
In this case, Lord Reid's observations in R v Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd [1973] AC 435 were pertinent: I have said more than once in recent cases that our change of practice in no longer regarding previous decisions of this House as absolutely binding does not mean that whenever we think that a previous decision was wrong we should reverse it. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
In this case, Lord Reid's observations in R v Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd [1973] AC 435 were pertinent: I have said more than once in recent cases that our change of practice in no longer regarding previous decisions of this House as absolutely binding does not mean that whenever we think that a previous decision was wrong we should reverse it. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
  People increasingly demand food in its natural form to nourish their bodies down to the cellular level. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:58 pm by Rick
The Court also notes that in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:14 am by charonqc
” John Reid was “far too rightwing”. [read post]