Search for: "People v. Render" Results 261 - 280 of 4,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2016, 4:40 am by Old Fox
It renders your video chat and voice calls private (nobody can listen in). [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 6:23 am by David Markus
Georgia in 1976, to  deeming it “cruel and unusual” — and thus banned by the Constitution — for people with mental handicaps in Atkins v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 7:50 am
Supreme Court's decision in Brady v Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 [1963] requires the People to turn over evidence which is material either to the defendant's guilt or to punishment. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
 Judge VanDyke has a point here.The question is whether the Cal Expo fairgrounds in Sacramento are a public forum sufficient to allow people to distribute First Amendment literature therein. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 12:08 pm
 Yeah, it's a hassle that some people drive in cans from Arizona to redeem them in California. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Accordingly, his claims are not properly preserved for appellate review under CPL 470.05, subd. 2 and based on the ruling in People v Cadorette. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The same sex crimes was not charged in more than one of the counts (see People v Saunders, 290 AD2d 461 [2002]; People v Taylor, 190 Misc 2d 124 [2002]). [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:44 am by Matthew Benedict
People v Bailey, 330 Mich App 41, 944 NW2d 370 (2019). [read post]