Search for: "People v. Root" Results 261 - 280 of 2,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2019, 10:54 am by David Oscar Markus
Footnote 2:The Court adopts in part Magistrate Judge Reid’s R&R with the following alterations: the pin cite in the citation on page six, line seven should be “1279” and omit citation to “n.2”; the pin cite in the citation on page seven, line seven should be “1223, n.2”; the case name on page seven, line nine should read: “Goebert v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 5:28 am by Andrew Koppelman
  They clearly are a source of law, as the plaintiffs found in Singer v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:23 am
The motion court found that the defendant's conduct was dangerous and ill-conceived, but it did not rise to the level of depraved indifference as defined by People v Feingold, 7 NY3d 288. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:13 am
He told the jury they were the root of the people in the justice system.He placed on the document camera for the jury a copy of the jury instruction about statutory damages. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:21 am by James Eckert
In People v McKenzie (#133 decided 6/26/12) the Court held that, in determining whether to charge Extreme Emotional Disturbance in a homicide trial, "the relevant inquiry was whether the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, presented a triable question, we believe that the issue of the reasonableness of defendant's explanation should have been put to the jury. [read post]