Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 261 - 280
of 6,116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 2:30 am
., v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 10:36 am
Basically, they want people to vote for people who are "loyal" to the party line in the primaries, as opposed to people that "cross the aisle" and occasionally vote for measures that are supported by the other side. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:53 am
In Tamara Smith v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 2:10 pm
” People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:52 pm
The second case I find interesting solely for the schaedenfraude it gives me. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:00 pm
In DeLaune v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:55 am
See, e.g., White v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:09 am
The harm Doe alleges does not flow solely from the product software. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 11:42 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:28 am
The case went to trial solely on the issue of damages. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for such… [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 11:06 am
On remand from the Michigan Supreme Court, on February 2, 2010, the Court of Appeals published a per curiam opinion in People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:57 am
§1182(a)(3)(B), for providing “material support,” in the sole form of medicines, to a foreign terrorist organization (“FTO”), specifically the New Peoples Army (“NPA”) of the Philippines. [read post]
20 May 2009, 11:31 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:32 am
It should not be possible to establish identity-based discriminatory content moderation based solely on inferences. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:42 am
Sidoti v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:20 pm
We also know (from pictures) that the pathway is used by some people on bikes, some people on skateboards, some people walking dogs, etc. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
The Supreme Court has given judgment in Patmalniece v SSWP [2011] UKSC 11, a case which required consideration of what constitutes direct discrimination on nationality grounds under EU law and, in cases of indirect discrimination, whether a concern to prevent “ social tourism” is a justification which is independent of nationality. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:48 am
In a 1985 decision, State v. [read post]
