Search for: "People v. Souter"
Results 261 - 280
of 462
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2010, 8:45 pm
Therefore, when we see Citizens United cited in the future, we won't hear people say, "Justice Kennedy said . . . [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
See Roper v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:48 pm
US v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
Baze v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
 Baze v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
ADDENDUM: Having read Justice Souter's dissent in Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 6:13 pm
Flores, Justice Souter's dissent in Alden v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:16 am
Apart, perhaps, from a videotape of the crime, one would have difficulty finding evidence more damaging to a criminal defendant's plea of innocence.Justice Kennedy, concurring in Arizona v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
Spisak, may be more enthusiastic about enforcing the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act than her predecessor, Justice Souter. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
She hazards that Souter may have been the broker behind the narrow ruling in NAMUDNO v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:07 am
He cites the Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
Souter’s first public speech since his retirement, at Harvard Law School for Constitution Day. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
In 1990, in the case of Austin v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:39 am
For example the Court of Appeals in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]), considered how Crawford applies two categories of evidence: DNA reports and , fingerprints, comparisons. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
Lusby v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:31 am
People of New York, Korematsu v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:23 am
Remember, this is the person that will be replacing David Souter. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
I find that people who listen to judges express their personal views on important questions that the courts are looking at, that they have a sense that the judge is coming into the process with a closed mind, that their personal views will somehow influence how they apply the law. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:55 am
Alemendarez-Torres v. [read post]
