Search for: "People v. Steele" Results 261 - 280 of 692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2017, 5:04 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
On June 1st, 2017, the United States District Court (USDC) at Washington D.C. granted summary judgement in the case of Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Royal Bank of Canada, 2017 BCCA 253 [35] Whether or not alleged misconduct provided just cause for dismissal is a question of mixed fact and law: Steel v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:44 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Jury trials serve the people’s right to be informed as to what occurs in their courts and reinforce the fact that the law comes from the people. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am by Randy Barnett
As I explain in my book at greater length, Chief Justice Salmon Chase dissented from the Supreme Court’s decision in Bradwell v Illinois (1873), which upheld the discrimination against women in licensing lawyers. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 2:23 pm by Elijah Yip
  The Second Circuit Court of Appeals took up this question recently in NLRB v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
--> (Ancient Automobile Trinidad, Cuba 2015 Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016)I am pleased to let those interested know that I have posted a draft of my essay, "The Human Rights Obligations of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs): Emerging Conceptual Structures and Principles in National and International Law and Policy. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
One of the paradigm examples of “continuity v. change” in The Innovator’s Dilemma, and the example whose aftermath I’ve witnessed for the last 20 years, is the integrated structural steel industry in the US, headquartered in Pittsburgh. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 7:15 am by Simon Lester
This statement is puzzling, given GATT Article XXIV and GATS Article V, which allow countries to negotiate bilateral or regional trade agreements. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Supreme Court justices in the Youngstown steel seizure case faced the question of the emergency authority of the President of the United States, not of the person of Harry S. [read post]