Search for: "Person v. Clayton"
Results 261 - 280
of 608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2020, 10:01 am
Clayton County Georgia (Supreme Court 2020). [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:18 am
Clayton County, Georgia, (Sup. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, at the time the opinion is issued. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
The plaintiffs seek class action status for a “Producer Class”—all persons or entities within the United States that directly sold to a Defendant one or more fed cattle for slaughter during the Class Period other than on a cost-plus basis—and an “Exchange Class”—all persons who transacted in live cattle futures and/or options traded on the CME or another U.S. exchange during the Class Period. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:20 am
There are two judgments : A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWFC 38 (11 May 2020) and A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2020] EWHC 1162 (Fam) (11 May 2020). [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 6:06 pm
A recently Court of Appeal decision in Stewart v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm
United States The mother of a popular YouTube personality sued a woman for defamation Tuesday, alleging she defamed the plaintiff on Instagram and published private information, including her address. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm
One of the powers the Act gave to the Supreme Court, writs of mandamus, was the subject of the famous Supreme Court case, Marbury v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:48 pm
Clayton County, Georgia and R.G. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 11:47 am
Clayton County, Georgia and Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:16 am
Clayton County, and R.G. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:16 am
Clayton County, and R.G. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 9:30 am
| CJEU rules on counteraction by conceptual differences in trade mark law, but leaves much to be resolved | Swedish Supreme Court favours copyright protection over freedom of information and of the press | Fair dealing and online learning in the time of coronavirus in South Africa | Remembering Clayton Christensen: how has “disruptive innovation” fared? [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:14 pm
In Salzberg v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:00 am
Bill SteinmanThe FCPA Blog In U.S. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm
Section 17(b) mandates that if a person is paid to promote a security, then they must disclose the nature, source and amount of that compensation. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 8:17 pm
Anyway, Justice Kavanaugh recited Section 2 of the Sherman Act, then moved on to Section 4 of the Clayton Act, which describes who can sue under the antitrust laws: “any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:36 am
v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:32 am
Clayton County, Georgia (out of Georgia), and R.G. and G. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:51 am
Filed: November 20, 2019 Opinion by: Judge Clayton Greene Jr. [read post]
