Search for: "Peter Lee" Results 261 - 280 of 1,237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2019, 3:25 am by SHG
Ask Peter Thiel, who funded a defamation suit against Gawker that bankrupted the site and forced it to close down. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” The Washington Post’s editorial board weighs in on Lee v. [read post]
24 May 2008, 6:40 pm
Coordinated by Lee Jay Berman, Mediator Tuesday, May 27, 2008 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:04 pm by Jerry Brito
You won’t find the words ‘government’ or ‘regulation’ in this post at EFF’s blog by Micah Lee and Peter Eckersley. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Autonomy, Copyright, and Structures of Creative Production — Interesting draft article from UC Davis Law professor Peter Lee that focuses attention on an underappreciated mechanism by which copyright promotes creative expression: by conferring a low-cost, easily obtained property right on creators, copyright lowers transaction costs in the value chain, which increases the viability of vertical disintegration—”mak[ing] it easier for creators to work as freelancers,… [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:01 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
Moreover, both Lee Yick and Wo Lee (whose appeal was also considered as part of this case) were arrested for refusing to pay a fine for operating without the permit, and they were imprisoned by the city’s sheriff, Peter Hopkins. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
” by Peter Baker and Michael Shear for New York Times Ethics National: “Feds: Ex-aide to U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Council Member Jack Evans” by Peter Jamison, Peter Hermann, Spencer Hsu, and Fenit Nirappil for Washington Post The post Monday’s LobbyComply News Roundup appeared first on LobbyComply. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 4:33 pm
Sir Peter Smith will now be remembered as much for this case1 in which he is censured in the strongest terms by the Court of Appeal as for his Da Vinci Code judgment2. [read post]
2 May 2007, 7:03 pm
Peter Lattman of the WSJ.com Law Blog has this post on Vonage's request to the Federal Circuit to send its patent case back to the district court. [read post]