Search for: "Peter S. Margulies" Results 261 - 280 of 343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Vishnu Kannan
Peter Margulies argued that the Trump administration’s new asylum rule exceeds statutory authority. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 8:34 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Peter Margulies discussed a Ninth Circuit ruling against the third country asylum rule. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Nick Basciano
Peter Margulies and Ben each offered thoughts on the opinion this morning. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:26 am by Steve Vladeck
Although there are too many examples of this approach to list (including the public comments from CIA Director Brennan), two paradigmatic cases have appeared here at Lawfare, in “Part I” of Ben’s “Thoughts on the SSCI Report,” posted on Monday, and Peter Margulies’ post from Tuesday on “Torturing Efficacy. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm by Series of Essays
Street Level Administrative Constitutionalism December 25, 2020 | Peter S. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:42 am by Jordan Brunner
Peter Margulies examined the Hawaii court’s injunction against President Trump’s refugee ban and highlighted the flaws in Maryland court's injunction. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:38 am by Benjamin Wittes
I'll leave the doctrinal dispute to him and to Peter Margulies, but suffice it for now to say that I think Steve overstates the matter when he says the decision "doesn't make any sense doctrinally. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 am by Benjamin Wittes
Nora Ellingsen <a data-cke-saved-href="https://lawfareblog.com/leaked-dhs-report-contradicts-white-house-claims-travel-ban" href="https://lawfareblog.com/leaked-dhs-report-contradicts-white-house-claims-travel-ban">explained</a> that a leaked DHS report contradicts claims by the White House that individuals from the seven Muslim majority countries in the refugee executive order pose a terrorist threat, and Peter… [read post]
27 May 2017, 7:53 am by Quinta Jurecic
Jordan and Amira Mikhail gave us the details of the ruling, and Peter Margulies gave us his thoughts. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:22 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Peter Margulies suggested that Israel has been effective in ensuring that its investigations of alleged violations of the law of armed conflict are largely cordoned off from the chain of command. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 9:42 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared a special mini-episode of the National Security Law Podcast on New Year’s Eve: Peter Margulies analyzed a Dec. 31 U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 7:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
Peter Margulies linked to an article he has written responding to critics of the 215 program who complain that FISC has interpreted the statute’s “relevance” standard overly broadly. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 5:35 am by Nick Basciano
Peter Margulies thought the case did address the First Amendment issues in substantive manner and gave an explanation of why. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 6:14 am by Gordon Ahl
Peter Margulies analyzed the decision of an Oregon judge to issue a temporary restraining order against the implementation of President Trump’s proclamation to bar uninsured immigrants. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 8:41 am by Elliot Setzer
Max Margulies argued that the National Commission on Public Service is right to recommend mandatory draft registration for women. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 12:23 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
The New York Times and the Washington Post report on Biden’s announcement, and Defense One’s Molly O’Toole reminds us of Biden’s influence in the Obama administration’s cautious approach to military force. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
Peter Margulies then examined the report’s treatment of human rights concerns. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm by Josh Blackman
Peter Margulies points out that beyond constitutional doubts, there still may be statutory problems with the new proclamation: The policy amounts to nationality-based discrimination with respect to the issuance of visas in violation of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 11:59 am by Alex Potcovaru
Peter Margulies wrote that containing Iran requires the U.S. to make tangible gains on the ground coupled with moral legitimacy based on international norms. [read post]