Search for: "Peter S. Margulies"
Results 261 - 280
of 343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2014, 11:00 am
I want to take issue with Peter Margulies’s laudatory remarks this weekend about the Harold Koh memos on extraterritorial application of the ICCPR and the CAT—you know, those memos that mysteriously showed up in the New York Times just as the United States was preparing to present its views on the ICCPR to the UN panel that oversees the treaty. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:48 pm
Peter S. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 7:00 am
Peter Margulies linked to an article he has written responding to critics of the 215 program who complain that FISC has interpreted the statute’s “relevance” standard overly broadly. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:55 am
Peter Margulies defended 702 collection as consistent with international norms, and insisted that the American surveillance program actually contains greater safeguards than their European counterparts. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:36 am
Peter Margulies gave a harsher attack on the report, arguing that the Review Group vastly underestimated the efficacy of the bulk metadata collection program, failed to consider the potential for abuse in trusting this data to the private sector and ignored safeguards currently in place. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Peter Margulies and Ben each offered thoughts on the opinion this morning. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:41 am
Clapper, I am largely, though not completely, in agreement with Peter Margulies’s assessment of the matter. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Peter Margulies explained that while the Report has a few good ideas, its more extreme solutions rely more heavily on “sloganeering” than on convincing analysis. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
Peter Margulies thought the case did address the First Amendment issues in substantive manner and gave an explanation of why. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:26 am
” Thus, by finding that the conviction could rest solely on Mehanna’s trip to Yemen, the court avoids any deeper discussion of the interesting First Amendment questions that Peter Margulies and David Cole raised last year. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:40 pm
The Mehanna case sparked a big First Amendment debate—on this site between David Cole and Peter Margulies (see also here and here)—during and after his prosecution in Massachusetts for alleged conspiracy to provide material support to Al Qaeda. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:43 am
Check out Wells and Raff’s recap, as well as Peter Margulies’ thoughts, and, of course, our Al Bahlul Case Page. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Catch up on all the action this weekend: Steve’s critique of the brief, which was authored, among others, by law professor Peter Margulies; Peter’s response; Steve’s reply; Peter’s sur-reply; Steve’s last word; and Peter’s (further!) [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:07 pm
Thanks to his “sur-reply”, I finally understand the premise of Peter Margulies’s argument—and his amicus brief—in al Bahlul with regard to why the en banc D.C. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Just click on them to go to the referenced post’s location in the book. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:22 am
Contents include:Feature ArticleGeoffrey S. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:00 am
Peter Margulies, of Roger Williams School of Law, writes in with these comments on law, ethics, and the hunger strike ongoing at Guantanamo: The hunger strike at Guantanamo has put bioethics on the frontlines of lawfare. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
And Peter Margulies of Roger Williams School of Law provided his thoughts on convicted terrorist Tarek Mehanna’s appeal. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:07 am
Peter Margulies writes in with the following summary of recent NIST efforts to build a framework for best practices in cybersecurity: The premise of President Obama’s Cybersecurity Executive Order (EO) is two-fold: first, that cybersecurity is a vital national objective, and second, that if Congress won’t act, the President will. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 11:00 am
Peter Margulies of Roger Williams School of Law writes in with the following thoughts on the First Circuit briefing in the Tarek Mehanna appeal: The federal material support statute forces courts and juries to distinguish independent speech that supports terrorism from speech coordinated with a foreign terrorist group (FTO), such as Al Qaeda. [read post]
